| |
|
Movie Archives:
Most Recent
| Highest
Rated |
Alphabetical
Mating Games
 |
|
Kinsey
Bill Condon, USA, 2004
Rating: 3.3
|
|
Posted: November 30,
2004
By
Laurence Station
Bill Condon won an Oscar for his adapted screenplay for Gods and
Monsters, a film he also directed. In focusing on James Whale's final
years (and creatively interweaving flashbacks via visions the famed director
had as dementia set in), Condon successfully conveyed a sense of who his
real-life subject was, without resorting to the pitfall-laden
cradle-to-grave biopic approach. For Kinsey, Condon's latest stab at
fictionalized biography, he plummets into the narrative abyss of trying to
relay too much information in too narrow a timeframe, which ultimately just
creates more distance -- not less -- between the audience and the subject.
Alfred Kinsey, of course, was the famed zoologist who published two landmark
books on human sexuality: Sexuality in the Human Male (1947) and
Sexuality in the Human Female (1953). Rather than concentrate on the
crucial period in which Kinsey and his team set about interviewing people
across America about their sexual predilections and peccadilloes, Condon
delves into Kinsey's strict Methodist boyhood and how he rebelled against
his father's wishes to become an engineer. We see his courtship of eventual
wife Clara, gaze at photographs of their three children, and witness a party
celebrating the publication of twenty years' work by Kinsey: an exhaustive
taxonomy of the gall wasp -- an insect Kinsey finds fascinating because no
two are alike.
When Kinsey is approached by a young couple having problems in the bedroom
and is embarrassed by the lack of scientifically certifiable advice he has
to offer, the frustrated scientist sets about creating a class on human
sexuality. This, of course, leads to interviewing people about their sex
lives, and causes a whole storm of controversy in a Puritanical country that
would rather keep private lives in the closet rather than admit that sex
involves more than the missionary position or the standard two-gender model.
By spending so much time and effort on exploring Kinsey's rather roundabout
method of becoming a cataloguer of sexual behaviors, Condon short-changes
the fascinating behavior of Kinsey and his team of researchers, who engaged
in open marriages, swapping spouses, having sex with test subjects and
filming all of it, ostensibly for scientific purposes. That tension arises
among the players in this emotionally tricky game is inevitable, but since
we're here to catalogue the scope of Kinsey's life, it's handled in a
perfunctory one-scene shouting match and blithely dispensed with. Why Kinsey
allowed or encouraged such clearly divisive and destructive behavior is
never adequately addressed. Writing it off as Kinsey's disciplined ability
to subdivide physical acts from matters of the heart, as Condon does, is too
easy.
Another area where Kinsey's moral ambiguity is given a free pass comes from
his 1948 interview with Mr. X, a man who has meticulously documented his
entire sexual history. Kinsey faithfully records the man's sex acts, which
include the molestation of hundreds of children, with calm, calculated
efficiency. But other quirks are glossed over. Kinsey's famed insertion of
objects into his urethra (most notably pencils and toothbrushes) is never
touched upon. We do get a scene of a little blood and Kinsey admitting to
his wife that he punctured his foreskin in an effort to "see what it felt
like." But this dark side of the man -- be it self-hatred, masochism in the
name of science, or what have you --is treated as an affectionate quirk or
totally ignored.
Condon prefers instead to show Kinsey reconciling with his cantankerous
father or wandering in the woods, a boy romantic enraptured by nature.
Kinsey's work -- the reason for his notoriety and, by extension, why this
film exists -- would have benefited enormously from a central focus, rather
than just another notch on the chronological checklist.
One enormous upside to Kinsey is the cast. Liam Neeson brings the
right mix of intellectual gravity and obsession to the title role, and Laura
Linney proves a supportive but assertively independent complement as
Kinsey's wife. Peter Sarsgaard does fine work as well as Clyde Martin, an
early supporter of Kinsey's study who winds up bedding both husband and
wife.
Kinsey casts too wide a biographic net, and treats its primary
subject with kid gloves. Thus, rather than replicate the deft touch
displayed in Gods and Monsters, Condon fumbles a chance to tell the
essential story (warts and all) of one of the more interesting and
revolutionary academics of the last century.


Site
design copyright © 2001-2011 Shaking Through.net. All original artwork,
photography and text used on this site is the sole copyright of the respective creator(s)/author(s). Reprinting, reposting, or citing any of the original
content appearing on this site without the written consent of Shaking
Through.net is strictly forbidden.
|
|
|
|
|
|