| |
|
To Be Continued...
Posted:
November 27, 2005
By
Kevin Forest Moreau, Director-in-Chief
Recently in this space, I discussed
the decline of the movie industry and what might be done to correct it.
When we parted ways at the end of that column, I promised that at least
one future idea would be forthcoming. No doubt you've been in an agonized
state of breathless anticipation for the last couple of weeks, waiting
with baited breath for the next spine-tingling chapter in our
pulse-pounding discussion.
Well, wait no longer, true believers! The cliffhanger is over! As we pick
up where we left off, our heroine is dangling precariously from the edge
of a cliff as our consortium of bad guys -- Internet downloads, bad
movies, inconsiderate, cell-phone-using theater patrons -- stomp on her
fingers with malicious glee. Who, oh who will save the day?
Flash Gordon, that's who. Or maybe Buck Rogers. Or Batman, Superman,
Captain America -- heck, even
Sky Captain.
I'm talking about serialization. When your father or grandfather was a
little boy, he'd spend his Saturdays at the local movie house, engrossed
in a program of cartoons, newsreels and "chapter plays," serialized
adventures that continued from week to week starring the likes of Flash
Gordon, Superman and other popular heroes of the day.
The influence of these serials can still be felt today, in films like the
Star Wars series and Raiders of the Lost Ark. More recently,
the Lord of the Rings trilogy, the Star Wars prequels, the
current resurgence of television shows with larger stories that unfold
over time (a result of the runaway popularity of last year's hits Lost
and Desperate Housewives) -- all of these have proven that
audiences don't mind waiting a while between installments of a larger
story.
So as an experiment to jump-start excitement at the movies, why not try
something similar? Instead of making audiences wait for years between
installments, why not borrow from TV -- or from the recent Matrix
sequels -- and produce a saga that could unfold over movie screens over a
shorter time frame -- say, nine months to a year (something roughly
analogous to a TV season).
Here's how it could work: Most movies adhere to a three-act structure --
why not break those acts up into three smaller mini-movies? And then show
them one at a time, with a new one unspooling, say, every three months? If
the average movie is two hours long, split one up into three acts and
you've got three forty-minute installments. It wouldn't be too hard to
find a couple of decent cliffhangers in most scripts -- action movies,
thrillers, horror movies, even many conventional dramas are built on story
beats that constantly heighten tension and increase suspense.
Each act could be bundled either with one or two other serials (for the
same price as a regular movie ticket) or with a standard feature-length
film, or perhaps a slightly shorter feature, from a little over an hour to
maybe an hour and a half. Or if you've got a surefire hit on your hands,
it could run by itself, at a slightly reduced ticket price, delighting
theater owners as new crowds fill the auditorium every hour or so.
If audiences don't care for one of the shorts, Hollywood executives don't
have to commit seppuku over the prospect of losing money on an
additional two forty-minute installments that no one wants to see -- those
future installments will be bundled in with other movies, providing
something of a captive audience, which might just like the second or third
chapter better than the first, and decide to go ahead and buy the eventual
DVD containing all of the installments. In that way, the format could even
help "problem" films -- say, the recent Clive Owen/Jennifer Aniston
vehicle Derailed -- grow an audience over time.
This format seems a natural for the ongoing glut of superhero and other
comic-based movies, from X-Men to
Hellboy. But
spy thrillers could work as well (that's one way to promote -- and
minimize the potential risk of -- the next James Bond film), as could any
number of genres. Yes, studios would have to figure out a way to determine
how much of a moviegoer's ticket price goes to which film, but I'm sure
they're up to the task.
Bringing back movie serials could be a way to energize the moviegoing
experience, offering something worth leaving the house (and Blockbuster
and Netflix) for. At least, it's worth a shot. At this point, what do we
have to lose?


Site
design copyright © 2001-2007 Shaking Through.net. All original artwork,
photography and text used on this site is the sole copyright of the respective creator(s)/author(s). Reprinting, reposting, or citing any of the original
content appearing on this site without the written consent of Shaking
Through.net is strictly forbidden. Contact us at
shaking@shakingthrough.net if
you wish to use any of the material published here.
|
|
|
|

|
|
Archived
Editorials |
|
December 03, 2006:
Happy Feet |
|
November 22, 2006:
Half Decade Anniversary |
|
October 07, 2006:
Jessica Simpson |
|
September 30, 2006:
New Orleans
and SNL |
|
June
2, 2006:
Dixie Chicks |
|
May 7, 2006:
Are Yahu Serious? |
|
February 16, 2006:
Bill O'Reilly & Brokeback
Mountain |
|
February 12, 2006:
Totally '80s (Grammys) |
|
January 31, 2006:
Freyed Oprah |
|
November 27, 2005:
To Be Continued...
(Bringing back movie
serials) |
|
November 21, 2005:
Fourth Birthday |
|
November 05, 2005: TV Remakes |
|
August 13, 2005:
Ten Commandments of Rock |
|
July 05, 2005:
Live 8 |
|
May 05, 2005:
Term Limits (for Rock Stars) |
|
April
29, 2005:
Pearl Jam Redux |
|
January 26, 2005:
Oscar Grouching |
|
October 31, 2004:
Three More Years! |
|
September 27, 2004:
Cleaning Out
My Closet |
|
August 25, 2004:
Shaking Through Mailbag |
|
June
23, 2004:
Summer Reading List |
|
June 11,
2004:
World Without Heroes (Bill Murray and Garfield) |
|
April 23,
2004:
Sold Out (Bob Dylan, Victoria's Secret, & Iraq) |
|
April
08, 2004:
The Day the Music Died (Kurt Cobain) |
|
Mar. 17, 2004:
Copping Out |
|
Feb.
27, 2004:
The Passion of Howard Stern |
|
Jan. 30, 2004:
Sex and the City |
|
Nov. 17, 2003:
California Über Alles |
|
Nov. 7, 2003:
Not-So-Terrible Twos |
|
Sept. 19, 2003:
Magic & Loss
(Johnny Cash and Warren Zevon) |
|
Aug. 17, 2003: Those '70s Shows |
|
May 27,
2003: Patriot Games (Darryl Worley) |
|
May 24,
2003: American Idol |
|
Mar. 23,
2003: Non-cents-ical (Dixie Chicks-50 Cent) |
|
Feb. 8,
2003: Where's the Love? (Pearl Jam) |
|
Jan. 1,
2003: High Resolutions |
|
Dec. 16,
2002: All I Want for Christmas |
|
Nov. 27,
2002: Things to be Thankful For |
|
Nov. 8, 2002: Near Wild Heaven
(Nirvana) |
|
Oct. 21,
2002: Happy Birthday to Us |
|
Sept.
11, 2002: The Little Things |
|
Aug. 20, 2002:
King for a Day |
|
July 9, 2002: Bill of Rights |
|
Apr. 18, 2002: Celebrity Skim |
|
Apr. 15, 2002: We Will Never Lie To
You |
|
Jan. 6, 2002: Something to Believe In |
|
Nov. 3, 2001: Who We Are |
|
|
|
|