| |
|
Where's the Love?
Posted: February
8, 2003
By
Kevin Forest Moreau, Chief Playa-Hata
"If I was Eddie Vedder, would you like
me any better?" --Local H, "Eddie
Vedder"
Memo to Pearl Jam fans: All you need is love.
Those five simple words sparked a small flurry of activity on our message
board late last year; one of our readers, displeased with my
less-than-glowing review of Pearl Jam's new
Riot
Act CD, decided to take me to task for chiding front man Eddie Vedder
for trotting out the well-worn lyrical cliché above. In one of the most
skillful showcases of hair-splitting ever recorded by man, "Jawn," whose "pearljamslion"
email address is a sure sign of his objectivity, had this to day (all
posts printed verbatim, grammar and spelling intact):
The author made a very dipshit mistake
here, if hes disagreeing with "all you need is love", hes disagreeing with
John Lennon, not Eddie Vedder, so dont blame Eddie you moron
When I pointed out, in response, that this coarse, unimaginative
attempt at provocation went against the spirit of the whole "all you need
is love" philosophy, and that I doubted using words like "dipshit" and
"moron" would win "Jawn" any points with Mr. Vedder, he fired off another
erudite electronic epistle with the following sentiment:
You fucking moron, Eddie isnt jesus, quit
being such a dipshit
On the same day that "Jawn" first posted, another reader, who chose to
remain anonymous, offered a similarly reasoned response to my review:
you loser. nice review of pearl jam's
Riot Act.
screw off. You would rather sit and listen to bullshit current pop crap.
(Yeah, Anonymous. You've really pegged me there; at least do your
homework before making statements about my musical tastes. It's not like
you don't have a whole site full of my self-indulgent reviews and top 10
lists to draw from.)
And there the matter lay, save for a quick dissent from a second anonymous
poster, until this week. Here's what a guy named Dave had to say about the
whole affair:
Listen, Kevin....your review of the album
was terrible. It don't really care about u and the hard core fan
disagreeing about eddie and john lennon...but you obviously have no clue
about music. Riot Act is a great album from one of the guttsiest,
innovative and truly artistic bands we have left. You've just no clue and
it shows!
There, in a nutshell, is what keeps nagging at me about this whole
thread. Disagreement = cluelessness. I don't mind getting slammed by
readers who disagree with my opinions; it comes with the territory, and my
self-esteem is secure enough to be able to laugh at such venomous
outbursts. But am I the only one who's struck by the irony of Pearl Jam
fans, of all people, being such a crude, overly sensitive and
quick-to-anger bunch? This is a band, after all, that's well regarded for
its passionate advocacy of (mostly) worthwhile causes (Ralph Nader,
anyone?), and for its intelligence. One assumes Mr. Vedder and his
compatriots hope their music is connecting with a more reasoned and
thoughtful segment of the public. I don't fault these posters for
disagreeing with me, but I know that if I were in Mr. Vedder's shoes, I
might find it embarrassing that these are the kind of zealots springing to
my defense. I can't help thinking about how Kurt Cobain reportedly
agonized over the fact that his music was becoming popular with the very
kinds of people he'd always hated, as the story about the idiots who
allegedly committed a rape while singing Nirvana's "Polly" made clear. I'm
certainly not equating these posts to rape, in any conceivable way, nor
comparing the writers to rapists. But you wonder if the members of Pearl
Jam might feel they deserve better representation.
To quote one "Lerxst," who has so far contributed the one post on this
topic that expresses sympathy with my viewpoint:
My message to them is..."lighten up".
Arguing for your favorite band by sounding off like a reject from the
Jerry Springer show does little to sway the intelligent over to your
"cause".
Valentine's Day is coming up, you guys. If you're so quick to defend
Mr. Vedder for stating that "All you need is love," why are you so quick
to lash out in a defensive manner? I'm sure Eddie would agree that the
right to disagree with one another is perhaps our most important and
cherished right. So where's the love?


Site
design copyright © 2001-2007 Shaking Through.net. All original artwork,
photography and text used on this site is the sole copyright of the respective creator(s)/author(s). Reprinting, reposting, or citing any of the original
content appearing on this site without the written consent of Shaking
Through.net is strictly forbidden. Contact us at
shaking@shakingthrough.net if
you wish to use any of the material published here.
|
|
|
|

|
|
Archived
Editorials |
|
December 03, 2006:
Happy Feet |
|
November 22, 2006:
Half Decade Anniversary |
|
October 07, 2006:
Jessica Simpson |
|
September 30, 2006:
New Orleans
and SNL |
|
June
2, 2006:
Dixie Chicks |
|
May 7, 2006:
Are Yahu Serious? |
|
February 16, 2006:
Bill O'Reilly & Brokeback
Mountain |
|
February 12, 2006:
Totally '80s (Grammys) |
|
January 31, 2006:
Freyed Oprah |
|
November 27, 2005:
To Be Continued...
(Bringing back movie
serials) |
|
November 21, 2005:
Fourth Birthday |
|
November 05, 2005: TV Remakes |
|
August 13, 2005:
Ten Commandments of Rock |
|
July 05, 2005:
Live 8 |
|
May 05, 2005:
Term Limits (for Rock Stars) |
|
April
29, 2005:
Pearl Jam Redux |
|
January 26, 2005:
Oscar Grouching |
|
October 31, 2004:
Three More Years! |
|
September 27, 2004:
Cleaning Out
My Closet |
|
August 25, 2004:
Shaking Through Mailbag |
|
June
23, 2004:
Summer Reading List |
|
June 11,
2004:
World Without Heroes (Bill Murray and Garfield) |
|
April 23,
2004:
Sold Out (Bob Dylan, Victoria's Secret, & Iraq) |
|
April
08, 2004:
The Day the Music Died (Kurt Cobain) |
|
Mar. 17, 2004:
Copping Out |
|
Feb.
27, 2004:
The Passion of Howard Stern |
|
Jan. 30, 2004:
Sex and the City |
|
Nov. 17, 2003:
California Über Alles |
|
Nov. 7, 2003:
Not-So-Terrible Twos |
|
Sept. 19, 2003:
Magic & Loss
(Johnny Cash and Warren Zevon) |
|
Aug. 17, 2003: Those '70s Shows |
|
May 27,
2003: Patriot Games (Darryl Worley) |
|
May 24,
2003: American Idol |
|
Mar. 23,
2003: Non-cents-ical (Dixie Chicks-50 Cent) |
|
Feb. 8,
2003: Where's the Love? (Pearl Jam) |
|
Jan. 1,
2003: High Resolutions |
|
Dec. 16,
2002: All I Want for Christmas |
|
Nov. 27,
2002: Things to be Thankful For |
|
Nov. 8, 2002: Near Wild Heaven
(Nirvana) |
|
Oct. 21,
2002: Happy Birthday to Us |
|
Sept.
11, 2002: The Little Things |
|
Aug. 20, 2002:
King for a Day |
|
July 9, 2002: Bill of Rights |
|
Apr. 18, 2002: Celebrity Skim |
|
Apr. 15, 2002: We Will Never Lie To
You |
|
Jan. 6, 2002: Something to Believe In |
|
Nov. 3, 2001: Who We Are |
|
|
|
|